Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/15/1995 01:45 PM House FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 220 "An Act relating to the duties of the commissioner of commerce and economic development concerning the Alaska Tourism Marketing Council; relating to the per diem travel expenses of the council's board of directors; relating to the powers and duties of the council; extending the termination date of the council; and providing for an effective date." ROD MOURANT, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE KOTT testified in support of HB 220. He stressed that the legislation assists in tourism expansion and diversification of the state's economy. He noted that the legislation allows the Commissioner of Department of Commerce and Economic Development to contract with a qualified in-state trade association to promote Alaska as a visitor destination through a cooperative marketing effort. The contract term would be expanded from two to four years. Mr. Mourant noted that section 2 recognizes a need for outside travel on the part of the Alaska Tourism Marketing Council (ATMC). He noted that ATMC reimbursable travel is currently limited to in-state travel. Section 2 would allow per diem and travel expenses for travel outside the state at a standard allowable rate. Mr. Mourant observed that sections 3 and 4 alleviate the effort of promoting Alaska as a tourist destination from the director level to the commissioner level. Section 5 amends the sunset date from 1996 to December 30, 1999. He noted 7 that the fiscal note accompanying HB 220 is simply the ATMC proposed operating budget. JOHN LITTON, MEMBER, ALASKA MARKETING TOURISM COUNCIL testified via the teleconference network from Sitka. He testified in support of HB 220. He noted that a trip he took to New York City to promote Alaska tourism resulted in the Good Morning America television show being broadcast from Juneau. The trip was not reimbursable. He emphasized that the legislation will assist the operations of the Council. KEITH PERKINS, MEMBER, CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA ASSEMBLY testified via the teleconference network from Sitka. He testified in support of HB 220. He noted that he is also a member of the Alaska Visitor's Association. He stressed support for ATMC's effort to market Alaska. NANCY LETHCOE, ALASKA WILDERNESS RECREATION AND TOURISM ASSOCIATION (AWRTC) testified via the teleconference network from Valdez. She provided members with a letter to Co-Chair Hanley (Attachment 6). She noted that AWRTC feels there is an imbalance in the membership of the Alaska Tourism Marketing Council. She stated that the imbalance has led to an unintentional bias of the Council which is unfavorable to small Alaskan owned and operated rural tourism businesses. She noted that her letter details areas in which the imbalance is evident. Ms. Lethcoe referred to suggestions for amendments listed in her letter. She stated that the definition of "qualified trade organization" should be expanded to include "hunting, sport fishing, and wilderness outfitters and guides." Ms. Lethcoe suggested that the Governor appoint 12 seats to the Council and the qualified trade association appoint 8 seats to the Alaska Tourism Marketing Council. She added that the qualified trade association should be required to appoint members that represent various sectors of the tourism industry. She emphasized the need for a "fair playing field" for the making of decisions regarding the expenditures of state funds. Mr. Mourant noted that AS 44.33.705 governs the appointments to the Board. He noted that the Alaska Tourism Marketing Council appoints 10 members. The Director of Tourism is also a member of the Board. In addition, the Governor appoints 10 members. He observed that statutes state that the Governor shall ensure that the Board is broadly representative of the different regions of the state and the various sectors of the visitor industry. He pointed out that if the definition of a qualified trade organization is 8 expanded to include the recommendations by AWRTC then camp grounds, food services, gift stores, tour and charter small plane operations and helicopter operations would also need to be considered. He maintained that the current definition already includes the recommendations by the AWRTC. Representative Brown noted that concerns have been expressed concerning which audiences will be targeted by the Council. She observed that the perception exists that cruise traffic has been overly targeted as opposed to independent travelers. She pointed out that any change would have to take under consideration the ongoing relationship with the large operators, who fund a large portion of the program. BOB DINDINGER, VICE CHAIR, ALASKA MARKETING TOURISM COUNCIL responded to comments by members. He noted that it takes eleven affirmative votes to take any action by the Council. He asserted that it is virtually impossible for the trade association to manipulate or take advantage of the process. He added that the trade association, by its own policy appoints 3 of its 10 participants on a geographic basis. The other 7 seats are appointed based upon their cash contributions to the program. He pointed out the 90 percent of the industry's cash contribution comes from less then 10 companies. He observed that legislative action has raised the percentage of industry contribution from 10 to 25 percent. He noted that appointments based on contributions range from $250.0 thousand dollars to 60.0 thousand dollars. Representative Brown referred to remarks by Ms. Lethcoe. Mr. Dindinger observed that the Council's funding has been reduced. He noted that when more money was available the Council was able to fund special interest marketing. He emphasized that the current funding level requires generic, centralized marketing. He asserted that all concerns have equally shared the pain of downsizing. In response to a question by Co-Chair Hanley, Mr. Mourant noted that "shall" was changed on page 1, line 11 to "may". Mr. Dindinger stated that the Council is not concerned by the change. Representative Brown noted that the change reflects the difference in language on page 1, lines 8 and 9. She did not think the change to "may" would constitute a problem. Representative Brown asked if the Council has considered marketing over Internet. Mr. Dindinger responded that the Council is actively investigating the possibility of utilizing network marketing technology. Mr. Mourant noted the expense of investing in computer network marketing. Representative Grussendorf noted that the contract term is 9 being changed from 2 to 4 years. He asked how the contract would be affected if the state did not appropriate funding. Mr. Mourant noted that everything is subject to legislative appropriation. Representative Martin spoke in support of network marketing. He expressed concern with the fiscal note. Co-Chair Hanley explained that the fiscal note by the Department of Commerce and Economic Development reflects the Council's operating budget. He noted that the fiscal note does not obligate future legislatures. He observed that the Council's funding level will be debated. Representative Mulder MOVED to report CSHB 220 (L&C) out of Committee with individual recommendations and with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 220 (L&C) was reported out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a fiscal impact note by the Department of Commerce and Economic Development, dated 3/8/95.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|